120(3)+121(5)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33443-2016 (O&M)

Reserved on: 06.08.2025 Date of pronouncement: 04.11.2025 M/S SANDHU SECURITY SERVICE ......... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present : Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate with Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate and Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing of FIR No.377 dated 30.07.2014, registered under Section 406 of IPC at Police Station Camp Palwal, District Palwal and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The present FIR has been registered on the basis of a complaint given to the police by the Executive Engineer, Sub Division, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam (for short ‘DHBVN’), Palwal, with the allegation that M/s Sandhu Security Services, SCO No. 45-46, First Floor, Office No. 105 Sector-11, Panchkula, was an approved contractor for providing skilled manpower under this Division on outsourcing basis w.e.f. 01.06.2009 to 31.05.2010 and accordingly, work orders were placed on a monthly basis for the supply of requisite manpower at various substations. The payment is regulated by multiplying the number of manpower provided by the firm with approved DC rates, applicable Employee Provident Fund (for short ‘EPF’) plus Employee State Insurance (for short ‘ESI’) plus service tax plus zero percent premium thereon. All the payments including EPF/ESI have been made to the firm through account payee cheques but firm has neither deposited the entire amount of EPF (both employer and employee share) and ESI (both employer and employee share) with the concerned authorities nor he has provided the contract labour with the mandatory EPF and ESI cards which was obligatory on the part of firm. The firm has, thus, dishonestly misappropriated the EPF and ESI amounts paid to him and has also committed breach of trust. The contractor’s employees working under the proprietor have not been paid the EPF amounts even after the termination of contract of this firm. The firm has not deposited the exact amount with the EPF/ESI authorities and has embezzled the same. Accordingly, a prayer was made to investigate the matter after lodging the FIR against M/s Sandhu Security Services, SCO No. 45-46, First Floor, Office No. 105 Sector-11, Panchkula under appropriate Sections of IPC and initiate proceedings against him. After registration of FIR, matter was investigated and after completion of investigation, final report has been presented in the Court for trial.

3. By way of present petition, petitioner is seeking the quashing of the FIR. It has been alleged that the FIR has been falsely registered against the petitioner with an ulterior motive to blackmail him. A bare perusal of the FIR shows that it is a case of violation of provisions of Section 39(5a) of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short ‘ESI Act’) according to which if the contribution payable under this Act is not paid by the principal employer on the date on which such contribution was due, he shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum or at such higher rates as may be specified in the regulations till the date of actual payment as has been provided in Section

39 of the said Act which is reproduced as below:-

“39. Contributions- (1) The contribution payable under this Act in respect of an employee shall comprise contribution payable by the employer (hereinafter referred to as the employer's contribution) and contribution payable by the employee (hereinafter referred to as the employee's contribution) and shall be paid to the Corporation.

(2) The contributions shall be paid at such rates as may be prescribed by the Central Government.

Provided that the rates so prescribed shall not be more than the rates which were in force immediately before the