In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of Decision:- 06.11.2025 Parveen Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Suneet Pal Singh Aulakh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

*****

SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. (482 of BNSS, 2023), has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.137 dated 22.09.2025, registered under Sections 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, at Police Station Satnampura, District Kapurthala.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has neither done any cheating nor has he forged any document or tampered with any revenue record. The petitioner acted in a bona fide manner as a power of attorney holder and got the property transferred in favour of his wife Sonia vide sale deed dated 31.03.2022. It is further contended that in the revenue record itself, ownership of Smt. Vijay Kumari @ Vijay Dadara has been duly recorded since 1985 and even at the time of execution of sale deed, jamabandi for the years 2000-01, 2005-06, 2010-11 and 2015-16 were duly recorded