IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :06.11.2025 SMT. REENU ... PETITIONER VERSUS DALIP ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. M.K. Sood, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner- Judgment Debtor challenging the impugned order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P- 5) passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad in Execution No. 284 of 2023, whereby objections filed by Judgment Debtor were dismissed.

2. The facts of the case are not in dispute. Admittedly, the decree holder- husband and the judgment debtor-wife had jointly filed a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. However, the said petition was dismissed vide order dated 02.11.2022 as wife had failed to appear for second motion.

3. It is pertinent to note that at the time of first motion, as per the terms

₹

of settlement towards permanent alimony, an amount of 9,50,000/- was paid to

the judgment debtor-wife. However, since the wife failed to appear despite

repeated opportunities, the mutual consent divorce peti