SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 19849

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SONU ALIAS SUNIL – Appellant
Versus
GRAM PANCHAYAT NAINWAL NOW SUPERSEDED MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 06.11.2025 Sonu @ Sunil ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Gram Panchayat Nainwal (now superseded)

Municipal Corporation, Manesar through its Commissioner ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Aashish Copra, Senior Advocate through V.C. with Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate and Ms. Rupa Pathania, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff seeking setting aside of the order dated 30.09.2025 (Annexure P-1); whereby application filed by the petitioner under Order XXIII Rule 1 (3) CPC (wrongly mentioned as Rules 1 and 3 CPC in the petition), has been dismissed by the ld. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurugram in Civil Suit No. CS-1174-2018 titled as Sonu alias Sunil vs. Gram Panchayat Nainwal

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff/petitioner through V.C., that the learned Trial Court was in error in dismissing the application of the petitioner for withdrawal of the suit as it failed to appreciate that the plaint suffered from various material

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top