SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJEN CHANDRAKANT – Appellant
Versus
DIVYA INVESTMENT CONSULTANTS AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

242 CR-1531-2017(O&M)

Date of decision: 06.11.2025 Rajen Chandrakant ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Divya Investment Consultants & Another ...Respondent(s)

***

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/defendant No.1 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 18.02.2017 (Annexure P1) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ambala whereby application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint, has been dismissed.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is prima facie unsustainable because as per the plaint/suit (Annexure P2), the total controversy is with regard to the sale and purchase of equity shares and money transaction between the investor/respondent-plaintiff and the Stock Broker/petitioner-defendant. It is submitted that as such, in terms of provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as “the SEBI Ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top