SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAWINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAGHBIR SINGH ETC. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RESERVED ON: 30.10.2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 07.11.2025 SAWINDER SINGH .....APPELLANT VERSUS RAGHBIR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR. .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Abhishek Shukla and Ms. Amyia Malhotra, Advocates for the appellant.

Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Respondent No.2 proceeded against ex parte v.o.d. 21.08.2025.

****

MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant–defendant No.2 against the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2000 passed by the learned District Judge, Amritsar, whereby the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tarn Taran, dated 02.02.1998, were set aside and the suit of the plaintiff–respondent for possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated

10.05.1992 was decreed.

Brief facts

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiff Raghbir Singh filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 10.05.1992, allegedly executed by defendant No.1 Gurmej Singh in his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top