IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124)

Date of Decision:-10.11.2025 SUSHMA LATA … Petitioner.

Versus LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANOTHER ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. S.S.Panag, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 14.10.2025 (Annexure P2), vide which, the evidence of the petitioner is closed by the order. Petitioner submits that the evidence of the petitioner is complete except the cross- examination of the Baljinder Kumar Sharma (PW4) is a summoned witness and petitioner has already examined him in chief and his cross-examination was deferred at the request of respondent/defendant and on that deferred date, he failed to appear and learned Civil Judge has closed the evidence of the petitioner for no fault of the petitioner. Petitioner be allowed only one opportunity to produce Baljinder Kumar Sharma for cross-examination purpose.

2. I have gone through the proceedings recorded by the learned Civil Judge in order dated 20.09.2025. There is a reference of an applica