IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHANDRASEKAR RUTHRAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10th November, 2025 Chandrasekar Ruthrappa ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Shailender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
(through VC)
Ms. Himani Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Rahul Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.
***
MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 64 dated 07.03.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Cyber South, District Gurugram.
2. The aforementioned FIR was lodged on the basis of a complaint submitted by the complainant-Anoop Singh, alleging that he was running a company under the name of Sky Tech Engineer India Private Limited, which was engaged in the business of civil construction. It was having head office at Gurugram and he used to take pan-India projects. He was having a contract of raising construction in Bangalore University and for that purpose,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.