SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 20288

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHANDRASEKAR RUTHRAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10th November, 2025 Chandrasekar Ruthrappa ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Shailender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

(through VC)

Ms. Himani Arora, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Rahul Yadav, Advocate for the complainant.

***

MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 64 dated 07.03.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Cyber South, District Gurugram.

2. The aforementioned FIR was lodged on the basis of a complaint submitted by the complainant-Anoop Singh, alleging that he was running a company under the name of Sky Tech Engineer India Private Limited, which was engaged in the business of civil construction. It was having head office at Gurugram and he used to take pan-India projects. He was having a contract of raising construction in Bangalore University and for that purpose,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top