[285] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 11.11.2025 Ravinder Kumar …Petitioner versus Lakhwinder Singh ….Respondent Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Sharad Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

[1] By way of present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed Order dated 01.05.2023 passed by the Rent Controller, Amritsar, whereby application filed by the tenant for treating the eviction petition as an ordinary eviction petition stands rejected.

[2] At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent points out that in terms of Section 50 of the Punjab Rent Act, 1995, the order is amenable to the appellate jurisdiction.

[3] Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of law. However, submits that the present revision petition though was filed within 30 days of passing of the order but by now the appeal would be barred by time. He prays that the time for which the revision remained pending before this Court be granted to the appellant keeping in view that he was pursing his remed