103 (24 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1.

CWP-36349-2019 (O&M) RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...Respondents ******

2.

CWP-36351-2019 (O&M)

BHIMSAIN CHAWLA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

3.

CWP-36374-2019 (O&M)

BABITA GOYAL ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

4.

CWP-36380-2019 (O&M)

MASOOD WAHAB ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

5.

CWP-36387-2019 (O&M) RAM NARESH SOLANKI ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

6.

CWP-36399-2019 (O&M)

SUNIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

7.

CWP-36400-2019 (O&M)

RITA CHAWLA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

8.

CWP-36402-2019 (O&M)

GAUTAM JAIN ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

9.

CWP-36404-2019 (O&M)

JITENDER KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

10.

CWP-36405-2019 (O&M)

RANUPRIYA TIWARI ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

11.

CWP-36414-2019 (O&M)

DRAUPADI DEVI ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

12.

CWP-36420-2019 (O&M)

GUNJITA GANGESH ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

13.

CWP-36424-2019 (O&M)

MUKESH BHATT ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

14.

CWP-36427-2019 (O&M)

ROHIT ARORA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

15.

CWP-36429-2019 (O&M)

ABHISHEK CHAWLA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

16.

CWP-36430-2019 (O&M)

RAJU CHAKRABORTY ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

17.

CWP-36431-2019 (O&M)

RAHUL MISHRA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

18.

CWP-36432-2019 (O&M)

RENU KAUSHIK ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

19.

CWP-36434-2019 (O&M)

CHITTOOR SHIVA PRASHAD ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

20.

CWP-36435-2019 (O&M)

GEETA SHARMA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

21.

CWP-36453-2019 (O&M)

AMIT KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

22.

CWP-36486-2019 (O&M)

KUNAL PESHIN ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

23.

CWP-36577-2019 (O&M)

RATNA RAO ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

24.

CWP-5076-2020 (O&M)

MUNI RAJ MEENA ....Petitioner Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondents ******

Date of decision: 12.11.2025 *****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY *****

Present: Mr. R.S.Randhawa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karanyog Singh, Advocate and Mr. Tarranum Madaan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rajeev Anand, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vandit Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.10.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.

*****

SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (Oral)

1. This common order shall dispose of above stated twenty four (24) petitions as the issue involved in all these petitions is similar. For the sake of brevity, facts are being derived from CWP-36349-2019.

2. This Court vide order dated 20.12.2019 in the present case, observed as under:-

“Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that respondent No.5 had availed loan facility from respondent No.2 in January 2015 after mortgaging the land on which respondent No.5 was to build flats for sale. The petitioner entered into a builder buyer agreement on 11.5.2016 and was allotted flat No.206. It is alleged that the petitioner has made the entire payment of the flat to respondent No.5, partially raising loan from the HDFC Bank after mortgaging his rights in the said flat as a collateral security. The petitioner is also stated to be residing in fla