IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108 CWP-28988-2025 Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 Amit Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Abhijeet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction setting aside of order dated 18.08.2025 whereby his claim has been rejected. He is further seeking direction to respondent to allow him to join on the post of Male Constable (General Duty).
2. The petitioner, pursuant to Advertisement No.4/2020 dated 30.12.2020, applied for the post of Male Constable (General Duty). During the pendency of the selection process, he came to be implicated in FIR No.235 dated 11.08.2021, under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and 181 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) registered at Police Station Sadar Mohindergarh, District Mohindergarh. He cleared all the stages. He filed verification-cum- attestation form as per Rule 12.18 of Pu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.