SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 20747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

108 CWP-28988-2025 Date of Decision: 12.11.2025 Amit Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Abhijeet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction setting aside of order dated 18.08.2025 whereby his claim has been rejected. He is further seeking direction to respondent to allow him to join on the post of Male Constable (General Duty).

2. The petitioner, pursuant to Advertisement No.4/2020 dated 30.12.2020, applied for the post of Male Constable (General Duty). During the pendency of the selection process, he came to be implicated in FIR No.235 dated 11.08.2021, under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and 181 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) registered at Police Station Sadar Mohindergarh, District Mohindergarh. He cleared all the stages. He filed verification-cum- attestation form as per Rule 12.18 of Pu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top