IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122)

Date of Decision:-12.11.2025 PARDEEP SINGH … Petitioner Versus SURJIT KAUR @ HARMANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 02.08.2025 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Barnala, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been rejected.

2. Respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for maintenance claiming maintenance @ Rs. 30,000/- per month for each of the plaintiffs and the Court fee which was paid has not been specified in the plaint, whereas, the copy of the plaint shows that the Court fee stamps of Rs.50/- has been affixed by the respondents/plaintiffs. Petitioner filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC seeking direction from the Court to respondents/plaintiffs to fix the ad voleram Court fee as per Section 7 of Court Fee Act or to reject the plaint. That application was declin