SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 128

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROOP LAL & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER PAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

219 RSA-4002-2013(O&M)

Date of decision: 12.11.2025 Roop Lal & Others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Mohinder Pal ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. G.S. Sarao, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The plaintiffs are in second appeal against the judgment of reversal dated 13.08.2013 passed by learned District Judge, Pathankot whereby Civil Appeal filed by the respondent/defendant against the trial Court judgment dated 06.12.2010, decreeing the suit of the plaintiffs, has been reversed and suit of the plaintiffs has been dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs/appellants had filed suit for separate possession by way of partition. The facts as pleaded in the plaint are that Gopal Chand, father of the plaintiffs and brother of the defendant Mohinder Pal, had purchased suit land measuring 4 marlas as described in the plaint, vide Sale Deed dated 03.10.1979. At the time of purchase, out of love and affection, Gopal Chand had added name of the defendant as purchaser to the extent of 1/5th share. The defendant was a 14-year-old minor at the t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top