SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 12004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PUNEET – Appellant
Versus
MAA CHINMASTIKA ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39413-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.11.2025 Puneet ....Petitioner Versus Maa Chinmastika Enterprises and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present : Mr. Ravi Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the order dated 08.02.2023, Annexure P11, vide which the petitioner was declared as proclaimed person in Complaint bearing CIS No. NACT/4019/2020 titled as ‘Maa Chinmastika Enterprises vs. Satyug India etc.’

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was summoned in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, vide order dated 12.01.2021 and released on bail on 17.05.2021. Thereafter, he was continuously appearing before the trial Court but for 30.03.2022, as his counsel had wrongly conveyed him the next date of hearing i.e. 30.08.2022, whereupon his bail was cancelled and bail bonds/surety bonds were forfeited to the State, leading to issuance of non-bailable warrants. Whereafter, on 02.09.2022, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was issued and the same was duly effected on 28.12.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top