SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 21194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

269-2 CRM-M-1362-2025(O&M)

Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 PULKIT NAGPAL AND ORS. ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....Respondents(s)

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present : Mr. Parveen Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate for the petitioners.

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 523 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.794 dated 06.12.2017 under Sections 323, 34, 354, 377, 406, 498-A, 506 of IPC (Section 354 of IPC deleted later on), registered at Police Station Sonipat City District Sonipat and all consequential proceedings arising threrefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 20.11.2023 (Annexure P-3) arrived at between the parties.

2. Keeping in view the fact that the parties entered into a compromise, this Court vide order dated 14.01.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded in that regard. Pursuant thereto, a report dated 28.01.2025 has been received from the Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top