SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 367

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S HARI CHAND BHAGAT RAM & ANR – Appellant
Versus
SATISH CHANDER & ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

1.

CR-1997-2017(O&M)

Date of Decision: November 17, 2025 M/S HARI CHAND BHAGAT RAM & ANR ........Petitioners Versus SATISH CHANDER & ANR ........Respondents

2.

CR-2611-2017(O&M)

HARSH KUMAR ALIAS ARSH KUMAR ........Petitioners Versus SATISH CHANDER &ORS. ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner in CR-1997-2017.

Mr. Esh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner in CR-2611-2017.

Mr. K. S. Dhillon, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of this common order, aforementioned two revision petitions shall stand disposed as they involve common question of law and fact.

For convenience, the facts are being taken from CR-1997-

2007.

By way of present revision petition(s), challenge has been laid to judgment dated 19.12.2016 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar whereby, a petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short ‘the Act’), preferred at the instance of respondent No.1 came to be allowed.

2. Briefly stating, respondent No.1-landlord having claimed himself to be an NRI owner of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top