SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 21291

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.63494 of 2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 Sachin .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *****

Present :- Mr. Najar Singh, Advocate and Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Diya Sodhi, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral)

CRM-45178-2025 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-63494-2025

1. Present petition has been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.102, dated 28.03.2024, under Sections 302, 201 IPC (Section 34 IPC added later on), registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat.

2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that FIR in the present case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Vikas son of Vinod Kumar. It was alleged that about a year back, the complainant worked in commando security, where Imran Ali had come to commando security in search of work. It was alleged that during that time, he got acquainted with him and thereafter, he left the job and started his own security company in Bahalgarh. It was alleged that Imran Ali started visiting him and on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top