SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NOOR MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
SAMMA & ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment Reserved On 30.10.2025 Judgment pronounced on 01.12.2025 NOOR MOHAMMAD (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ... APPELLANTS VERSUS SAMMA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS.

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Kamaljeet Saraf, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate, Mr. Sukhandeep Singh, Advocate and Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for the respondents.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

1. The unsuccessful plaintiff–appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 10.05.1990 passed by the Court of the Sub Judge 1st Class, Ferozepur Jhirka, whereby their suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction was dismissed. Appellant is further aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 01.04.1992 passed by the District Judge, Gurgaon, dismissing the first appeal preferred by him.

2. The case set up by the plaintiff–appellant in his suit for declaration and permanent injunction was that he is the owner in possession of agricultural land measuring 25 kanals 4 marlas situated within the revenue estate of village Jehtana, District Gurgaon. A part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top