IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment reserved on 31.10.2025 Judgment pronounced on 01.12.2025 BIHARI LAL ... APPELLANT VERSUS PARTAP SINGH AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

****

PARMOD GOYAL , J.

1. Plaintiff–appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 05.06.1989 passed by the Sub Judge IInd Class, Mahendergarh, whereby the suit for possession by way of partition filed by the plaintiff–appellant was dismissed and also by the judgment and decree dated 07.02.1992 passed by the Additional District Judge, Narnaul, whereby the first appeal preferred by the plaintiff–

appellant was also dismissed.

2. The plaintiff–appellant had sought possession of the suit property by way of partition, claiming that the suit property is joint property in which the plaintiff–appellant and the proforma defendants have 1/3^rd share, and that the plaintiff–appellant along with defendant Nos. 6 and 7 intended to raise construction over their share in the joint property. Proforma defendant Nos. 6 and 7, however, were given up before Court of f