IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANKIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.690 dated 03.11.2022, registered under Sections 323, 302, 120-B and 201 IPC, at Police Station Surajkund.
2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for 3 years and 18 days. He alleges false implication. He was named alongwith Ajay and Robin alias Ravi, who have been granted bail, vide orders dated 03.05.2024 and 15.01.2024, respectively. The petitioner and the deceased were cousins and This Court, vide order dated 10.11.2025, granted him interim bail, but he has not misused the same and surrendered on the stipulated date. He is not involved in any other case.
3. The custody certificate dated 28.11.2025, filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 3 years and 18 days.
4. Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant opposes the bail on the ground that there is a CCTV footage which clearly shows the petitioner’s presence at the spot and the complainant has supported the prosecution version while two other eye- witnesses being his uncles have turned host
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.