SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATY PARKASH & ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

212 DECIDED ON: 02.12.2025 SATY PARKASH AND ANR.

......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Sajjan Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG Haryana Mr. Garvit Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.4,5,8,9,10,12 and 13 SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Relief Sought

1. The present civil writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus to quash the promotion order Annexure P-7 dated 17.01.2017 and Annexure P-8 dated 30.05.2017 qua respondent No. 3 to 18 only and further directing the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners to the post of Head Mechanic from the dates the persons whose rights accrued later than the petitioners have been granted promotion.

Brief facts

2. The petitioners are employees of the Haryana Transport Department, Haryana Roadways, and the present writ petition concerns promotion to the post of Head Mechanic under the Haryana Transport Department (Group-C) Haryana Roadways Service Rules, 1995.

3. Under th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top