SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Naresh Kumar ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Ors.

.....Respondents Reserved on : 12.09.2025 Pronounced on: 2.12.2025 Judgment uploaded on: 04.12.2025 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced: Full Judgment CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. I.S. Pabla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. S.S. Gill, Advocate for respondent No.2.

AARADHNA SAWHNEY , J (ORAL)

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to order dated 10.06.2019 (Annexure P.5) passed by the then learned Sessions Judge Kurukshetra vide which revision petition filed by the complainant-respondent No.2 against order dated 25.04.2019 passed by learned JMIC, Kurukshetra, dismissing his application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C to lead additional evidence, has been accepted while allowing the same.

2. Relevant facts as emerging from the documents on record be noticed hereinbelow:

Complainant Hari Singh filed a complaint against the petitioners and others, who are his grand-sons averring therein that he was owner in possession of land measuring 72 ka

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top