IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106+214)
CRM-47601-2025 in/and CRM-M-40583-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-02.12.2025 HIMANSHU ……Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****
Present: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, Senior DAG, Haryana.
None for respondent No. 2.
****
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed inter alia praying for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 95 dated 23.03.2025, under Sections 351(3), 64(2)(m) and 77 of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Sector 5, District Panchkula.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the consensual relationship turned sour, which led to the lodging of the present FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the exchange of photographs were consensual and on the asking of the complainant herself rather she had also been sending photographs on her own accord. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the material witnesses have been examined and the petitioner has been in custody for the last more than seven months.
3. Learned State counsel has also filed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.