SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 21858

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106+214)

CRM-47601-2025 in/and CRM-M-40583-2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision:-02.12.2025 HIMANSHU ……Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****

Present: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Swati Batra, Senior DAG, Haryana.

None for respondent No. 2.

****

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed inter alia praying for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 95 dated 23.03.2025, under Sections 351(3), 64(2)(m) and 77 of the BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Sector 5, District Panchkula.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the consensual relationship turned sour, which led to the lodging of the present FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the exchange of photographs were consensual and on the asking of the complainant herself rather she had also been sending photographs on her own accord. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the material witnesses have been examined and the petitioner has been in custody for the last more than seven months.

3. Learned State counsel has also filed the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top