SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 717

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANMOHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANMOHAN SINGH ...PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

....RESPONDENTS

1. The date when the judgment is reserved 16.10.2025 2. The date when the judgment is pronounced 02.12.2025

3. The date when the judgment is uploaded

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any of the pronouncement of full Not applicable judgment and reason thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.

Present: Mr. B.S. Patwalia, Advocate with for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S Kanwar, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Chamandeep, Advocate for the respondent-UOI Mr. I.S. Sindhu, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to 4 ****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J Prayer

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to allow him to continue in service as Senior Librarian at the National Institute of Technical Teachers Training and Research (NITTTR) beyond the age of 62 years, up to 65 years, contending that the post of Senior Librarian is a faculty position and therefore, the provisions regarding superannuatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top