SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 12085

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAVIATA – Appellant
Versus
SANDEEP – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.221 Date of Decision: 03.12.2025 SAVITA ....Applicant Versus SANDEEP KUMAR .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Ashish Grewal, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)

At this stage, counsel for the respondent submits that he does not intend to file reply to the transfer application, though he contest the same.

Counsel for the parties heard.

The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking transfer of the petition under Section 13 (1) (i-a) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. HMA/933/2022, titled ‘Sandeep Kumar v/s Savita’, filed by the respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court, Yamunanagar and she seeks transfer of the same to the Family Court, Naraingarh, District Ambala.

At the very outset, it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties, had taken place on 03.03.2014 but no child was born from the said wedlock. On account of matrimonial dispute, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is not having any source of earning and therefore, she had filed petition u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top