IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 04.12.2025 Saroj …Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2-U.T. Chandigarh.

****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL)

1. The petitioner/workman, has thrown a challenge to the award dated 20.05.2015 (Annexure P-3), passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal concerned, by filing the instant writ petition, cast under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, on the principle ground, that though the act and conduct of termination of services of the petitioner/workman, was found to be illegal. Despite that granting re-instatement to the petitioner/workman, she was granted a meagre compensation of Rs.45,000/-, only, by the learned Tribunal concerned.

2. Before this Court delves into in evaluating the validity of the award (supra), it is imperative to have a glimpse upon the facts of the case, qua which, there is no wrangle between the parties concerned.

3. The pe