SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHARAN DASS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2000-1993 (O&M)

Date of decision: 04.12.2025 Charan Dass (deceased) through his LRs ...Appellant(s)

Versus Punjab State and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Pranav Chamoli, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiff and is being pursued by his LRs.

2. Challenge in the present Regular Second Appeal is to the judgment dated 14.01.1992 vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration to the effect that order dated 20.04.1985 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Amritsar whereby services of the plaintiff had been dispensed with was illegal and even order dated 12.08.1985 whereby appeal of the plaintiff had been dismissed was also illegal, had been dismissed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 27.05.1993 passed by the First Appellate Court vide which the appeal filed by the plaintiff had also been dismissed.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT(S):-

3. Learned couns

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top