SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 22101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT JANGRA – Appellant
Versus
KULDEEP SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-8813-2025 Date of decision: 04.12.2025 AMIT JANGRA ..Petitioner Versus KULDEEP SINGH ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the petitioner.

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. The challenge in the present revision petition is to order dated 13.10.2025 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hisar, whereby, application moved by respondent-defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘CPC’), whereby, petitioner was directed to pay the ad valorem Court fee against the claimed amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.50,00,000/-.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that application filed by respondent is wrongly allowed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hisar. He further contends that liberty be granted to him to amend the civil suit.

3. He relies upon order dated 29.05.2012 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3987 of 2006, titled as “State of Punjab Vs. Jagdip Singh Chowhan and others”, and judgment passed by this Court in Civil Revision No.4039 of 2023, titled as “Hardip Singh Vs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top