128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-8971-2025 Date of Decision: 04.12.2025 GURMINDER DHALIWAL ....Petitioner Versus SUDARSHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Arun Kumar Kaundal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Promila Nain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Thakur, Advocate and Ms. Kanchan Kumari, Advocate for the respondents.

Parmod Goyal, J. (Oral)

Petitioner/plaintiff is aggrieved by impugned order dated

17.11.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana vide which evidence of petitioner/plaintiff was closed on failure to conclude evidence despite availing numerous opportunities including five last and final opportunities.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff has argued that petitioner/plaintiff is a widow having twin daughters and not supported by anyone, therefore, could not lead her evidence in affirmative as short dates were being given. It is asserted that petitioner/plaintiff if granted opportunity to lead evidence she shall conclude the same at the earliest. Petitioner has placed reliance upon judgment titled as Joginder Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs Vs. Dr. Virinderjit