IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

CWP-17607-2023 Decided on: 05.12.2025 Anita Devi and others ... Petitioner Versus Divisional Commissioner and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed in the year 2023 and from time to time, the following orders were passed:-

“Learned counsel for the petitioners requests for an adjournment to place on record copies of both the agreements, which are in question.

List again on 30.10.2023.

11.08.2023 Sd/-

Learned counsel representing the petitioners requests for an adjournment to place on record a copy of agreement.

In view of the aforesaid request, the matter is adjourned to 8.1.2024.

Counsel for the petitioners requests for an

adjournment to bring on record a copy of the agreement in

compliance with the previous order.

08.01.2024 Sd/-

CM-1902-2024 granted permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application as according to him there are some inadvertent errors.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

CWP-17607-2023 List on 19.03.2024.

12.02.2024 Sd/-

Counsel for the petitioner prays for more time to comply with order dated 30.10.2023.

List on 09.05.2024.

19.03.2024 Sd/-

Request for adjournment has been made on behalf of the arguing counsel for the petitioners, as he is stated to have some health issues.

List on 06.08.2024.

09.05.2024 Sd/-

CM-7514-CWP-2024 Prayer made in the application is for exemption from filing the certified copies of Annexures P-7 and P-8.

Application is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions.

CWP-7513-CWP-2024 For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed.

Annexures P-7 and P-8, are taken on record.

CWP-17607-2023 Request for an adjournment has been made on behalf of the arguing counsel for the petitioner.

Request for deferment has been made on behalf of List on 03.04.2025.

11.12.2024 Sd/-

There is a written request for adjournment on behalf of the arguing counsel Mr. Vivek Goyal, appearing for the petitioners. List on 15.09.2025.

It is noted that several requests for adjournment have been sought for on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners.

It is expected that the learned counsel for the petitioners will be ready to address arguments on the adjourned date of hearing.

April 03, 2025 Sd/-

On request, adjourned to 05.12.2025.

15.09.2025 Sd/-”

2. Today again, a request has been made by proxy counsel for the petitioners for adjournment.

3. This Court finds no reason to adjourn the case. It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing the present case.

4. Dismissed for non-prosecution.

05.12.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI)

Bhumika JUDGE