IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARINDER JIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMIT UPPAL AND OTHERS – Respondent
210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ARB-620-2024(O&M)
Date of Decision: 05.12.2025 Harinder Jit Singh ....Petitioner(s)
Versus Amit Uppal and others .....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Rahul Vijay Singh Chugh, Advocate for Ms. Harpreet Kaur Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Lakshita, Advocate and Ms. Monika Jangra, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Dassaur, Advocate, for the respondent.
****
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an Abitrator to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that a lease deed was executed between the parties by way of an agreement (Annexure P-1) which contains an arbitration clause i.e. Clause 15. He submitted that as per Clause 15, in case a dispute arises between the parties, the matter will be referred to the Arbitral Tribunal. He submitted that despite repeated notices being given to the respondents, no Arbitrator was appointed.
3. Learned counse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.