SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 728

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Reserved: 02.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 05.12.2025.

SXXXXX ....Applicant.

Versus Amit Verma ...Respondent.

***

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR .......

Present: Ms. Suman Kumari, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel)

for the applicant.

***

Sukhvinder Kaur , J .

1. Applicant/ prosecutrix has preferred the instant application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against judgment dated 31.07.2018, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, vide which respondent has been acquitted of offences punishable under Sections

376(2) (n) and 506 of IPC.

2. The factual scenario, as per prosecution version is that on 14.02.2017, prosecutrix got recorded her statement with the police alleging therein that she had done catering work with the accused and he had kept the documents of her daughter with him. On 08.11.2016 at about 12.10 P.M., the accused after blackmailing, committed wrong act with her and whenever she tried to maintain distance from the accused, he threatened to defame her and her daughter and to kill her husband and had again committed wrong act with her. The accus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top