SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM SARUP – Appellant
Versus
BHARPAI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 08.12.2025 Ram Sarup through his LRs ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Bharpai through her LR ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Mohan Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant against the judgment of reversal dated 13.08.2008 passed by the first Appellate Court; whereby Civil Appeal filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein has been allowed, and suit of the plaintiff has been decreed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff had filed the present suit seeking declaration as owner in possession of the suit property as described in the plaint; and a declaration that the judgment and decree dated 05.06.1996 passed by the learned additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhiwani in Civil Suit No. 209 of 1996 titled as Ram Sarup vs. Bharpai in respect of the suit land declaring the defendant as owner in possession of the suit land; and the mutation No. 1016 dated 29.06.1996 on the basis of the aforesaid judgment and decree, are illegal, null and void being fraudule

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top