SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 31

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KHAZANI DEVI & OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
NAV BHARAT & OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :- 08.12.2025 Khanzani Devi @ Sajani and others … Appellants Versus Nav Bharat and others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate with Ms. Prerna Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .(Oral)

1. The appellants/defendants, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 19.12.1995 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (II), Jind whereby the well-reasoned judgment and decree dated 09.03.1992 of the learned Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Narwana was unjustifiably overturned, most respectfully invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal (for short “RSA”). The appellants seek restoration of the decree rightly granted by the Trial Court and appropriate redress for the substantial miscarriage of justice that has resulted.

1.1. It is most respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree are vitiated by manifest perversity, substantial errors of law, and a fundamentally flawed appreciation of the evidentiary rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top