IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124) CRR(F) No. 228 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 Sahil Kumar ......Petitioner Versus Sheetal and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate and Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Narnaul, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance of Rs. 4,500/- per month and Rs. 4,000/- per month was awarded in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 respectively. Furthermore, a sum of Rs. 5,500/- was also awarded to the respondents as litigation expenses.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 was solemnized on 22.2.2016, as per Hindu religious rites and ceremonies and a male child was born from the said wedlock on 07.5.2017. A matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondents filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondents. The lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.