SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 22460

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (124) CRR(F) No. 228 of 2025 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 08.12.2025 Sahil Kumar ......Petitioner Versus Sheetal and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate and Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Narnaul, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., whereby maintenance of Rs. 4,500/- per month and Rs. 4,000/- per month was awarded in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 respectively. Furthermore, a sum of Rs. 5,500/- was also awarded to the respondents as litigation expenses.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 was solemnized on 22.2.2016, as per Hindu religious rites and ceremonies and a male child was born from the said wedlock on 07.5.2017. A matrimonial dispute ensued between the couple and the respondents filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance. The petitioner filed a reply and contested the claim made by the respondents. The lear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top