IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SALIM AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
NAJIM – Respondent
AT CHANDIGARH CR-8396-2025 (O&M)
(134)
Date of Decision:-08.12.2025 Salim and another … Petitioners Versus Najim ... Respondent ****
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, for the petitioners.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)
1. The petitioners respectfully invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India through the present petition, seeking interference with the impugned order dated 29.09.2025 (Annexures P-4 and P-5). By the said order, the learned Court below rejected the petitioners’ objections and allowed the execution petition, thereby occasioning grave prejudice to their rights and materially affecting their substantive interests.
2. Briefly stated, the respondent–plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering in any manner with his actual physical possession over the suit land. The suit was decreed, and the appeal preferred by the present petitioners was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 07.03.2024. Thereafter, the respondent–decree holder initiated execution proceedings under Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, see
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.