IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (120 Date of Decision:-09.12.2025 KEWAL SINGH AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus SHER SINGH AND OTHERS ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Rai Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The petitioners have invoked the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India through the present revision petition, assailing the order dated 20.10.2025 (Annexure P-6). By the impugned order, the learned trial Court allowed the impleadment of a subsequent purchaser as a party to the suit, a course of action which the petitioners contend to be legally untenable and contrary to the settled principles governing the addition of parties.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision petition are that the respondents instituted a suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the petitioners–defendants from alienating or otherwise encumbering a specifically valuable portion of the suit property, as well as from delivering possession thereof to any third party. The respondents asserted that the suit land c