IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211 CRM-M-60344-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.12.2025 Harshit ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ****
Present: Mr. Rahuldeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana ****
AMAN CHAUDHARY , J. (Oral)
1. On 29.10.2025, this Court had passed the following order:-
“Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is stated to be present at the spot however no overt act has been attributed to him. He along with the aforesaid coaccused had tried to de- escalate the matter. Co-accused who is similarly situated namely Anup Nagar @ Anup Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 30.09.2025 and even co-accused Vikash Nagar, who is nephew of Anup Nagar has been granted bail by the trial Court. The petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate.
Notice of motion.
At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.
Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 15.11.202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.