SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 22778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

211 CRM-M-60344-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:09.12.2025 Harshit ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ****

Present: Mr. Rahuldeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG Haryana ****

AMAN CHAUDHARY , J. (Oral)

1. On 29.10.2025, this Court had passed the following order:-

“Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is stated to be present at the spot however no overt act has been attributed to him. He along with the aforesaid coaccused had tried to de- escalate the matter. Co-accused who is similarly situated namely Anup Nagar @ Anup Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 30.09.2025 and even co-accused Vikash Nagar, who is nephew of Anup Nagar has been granted bail by the trial Court. The petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate.

Notice of motion.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.

Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 15.11.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top