SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 22843

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DR SUKHSAGAR RATOL – Appellant
Versus
DR TANYA MISHRA DIXIT – Respondent


289 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

ARB-267-2025 Date of Decision: 11.12.2025 ****

Dr. Sukhsagar Ratol ..... Petitioner Versus Dr. Tanya Mishra Dixit ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate Ms. Salina Chalana, Advocate Mr. Harit Narang, Advocate &

Ms. Manveen Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Supriya Garg, Advocate for the respondent.

****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J . (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes which have arisen between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a Unit Franchise Agreement dated 17.04.2024 was executed between the petitioner and the respondent wherein exists a valid arbitration clause i.e. Article 27 (4). He further submitted that the said clause provides that in case any dispute arises between the parties relating to performance or non- performance of the rights and obligations set forth herein or the breach, termination, invalidity or interpretation thereof, the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top