IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: December 11, 2025 Surinder Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Sanjeev Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Mr.Manmeet Singh Rana and Mr.Aaryan Kagwal, Advocates for Mr.P.S.Jammu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Manish Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the orders dated

09.05.2022 as well as 25.11.2022, vide which, the applications filed by the petitioner-decree holder, for attachment of the property were dismissed.

In pursuance of the notice issued, the respondent made appearance through counsel. Counsel for the parties heard.

The facts germane, to be noticed, are as follows:-

That, initially, petitioner-Surinder Kumar had filed a suit under Order

32 CPC for seeking recovery from the respondent-Sanjeev Kumar. The said suit was filed on the basis of the pronote and receipt dated 01.11.2017 executed by the respondent, in favour of the petitioner. The suit was decree vide judgment dated 18.01.2021, copy whereof is Annexure P-1. Thereupon, the petitioner, being the decree holder, had filed an execution. During the pendency of