IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.12.2025 Satish Kumar ....Petitioner VERSUS Sukhwinder Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ,J. (ORAL)

1. The present civil revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside orders dated 26.11.2025(Annexure-P5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Patiala, whereby, the application preferred by the petitioner(defendant No.1) under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of written statement has been dismissed.

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the respondent no. 1(plaintiff) instituted a suit for possession by way of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 10.06.2019, seeking a direction to the petitioner(defendant No.1) for execution and registration of the sale deed in respect of a shop measuring 35 sq. yards, along with a suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner and other defendants and their agents from alienating, transferring, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of the suit property. The petitioner/defendants