IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ GURMAIL KAUR – Appellant
Versus
SHER SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 11.12.2025 Raj Gurmail Kaur ...Petitioner(s)
Vs.
Sher Singh and others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff laying challenge to the order dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana; whereby in an application filed by the respondent under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, defence of the petitioner has been struck off; and order dated 03.11.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana; whereby application filed by the plaintiff for recalling of order dated 04.11.2024 has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in passing the impugned orders, the learned Trial Court has failed to appreciate that there was some miscommunication between learned counsel for the petitioner and the Court. To elaborate, learned counsel refers to averments as made in paras 8 and 9 of the present petition, which read as under:-
“8. That it is t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.