IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1## ##PAGE2##
CRM-M-59619-2025 (O&M) -2-
petitioner was the driver of the truck. The other occupants were co-accused
Hardeep Singh and Parveen Kumar. On conducting search, 07 plastic bags
containing 01 quintal 40 kgs of poppy husk were found kept in the vehicle
which were taken into custody by police. The petitioner and the co-accused
were formally arrested. Investigation now stands concluded.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has
been falsely implicated in this case. A false recovery has been planted upon
him. The provisions of the NDPS Act had not been followed by the
Investigating Agency. No Form 29 was sent along with samples to FSL. The
trial will take considerable time to conclude. Further incarceration of the
petitioner would not serve any useful purpose. It is, thus argued that the
petition deserves to be allowed.
4. Per contra, learned State counsel while supporting the pleas as
taken in the status report has argued that there are serious allegations against
the petitioner. Commercial quantity of poppy husk was recovered from the
conscious possession of the petitioner as well as co-accused. The petitioner
is a habitual offender. There are chances of his committing similar offences
again, if extended benefit of bail. Rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are
attracted in this case as commercial quantity of contraband had been
recovered from him. There is no material or substantive change in the
circumstances since the date of dismissal of his previous petition. It is,
therefore, argued that the petitioner is not entitled to be granted benefit of
bail.
5. This Court has heard rival submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties.
HARJEET KAUR
2025.12.19 17:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CRM-M-59619-2025 (O&M) -3-
6. The petitioner along with the co-accused is alleged to have been
found in conscious possession of commercial quantity of contraband. Rigors
of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are therefore applicable in this case. As per
his custody certificate, he is in custody since 18.04.2024 i.e. for a period of
01 year and 08 months. Co-accused Parveen Kumar and Hardeep Singh,
whose case is on similar footings have been extended benefit of bail. Ever
since the withdrawal of his previous petition, a period of more than 09
months has expired. The trial is obviously likely to take time as no
prosecution witness has been examined so far. Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Rabi Prakash vs. State of Odisha : 2023 Live Law (SC) 533 has held that
the prolonged incarceration, generally militates against the most precious
fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and in
such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo
created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act. Similar view has been
taken by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ankur Chaudhary vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh : 2024 (4) RCR (Criminal) 172. Reliance can also be
placed upon Mohd. Muslim @ Hussain vs. State (NCT of Delhi) : 2023
AIR(SC) 1648 2023 AIR(SC) 1648, wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court, while
granting concession of regular bail to an accused, from whom commercial
quantity of the contraband was allegedly recovered, has held that grant of
bail on the ground of undue delay in trial cannot be said to be fettered by
Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Reference can also be made to the authority
cited as Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and
another, 2022(10) SCC 51, wherein similar observations were made by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court. Reliance can also be placed upon the authority
HARJEET KAUR
2025.12.19 17:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE4##CRM-M-59619-2025 (O&M) -4-
cited as Bhupender Singh vs. Narcotic Control Bureau : (2022) 2 RCR
(Criminal) 706, wherein a Division Bench of this Court, after considering
issue with respect to achieving balance between right to speedy trial
guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the rigors
enumerated under Section 37 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.