SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALWINDER KAUR RAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

201 Date of decision :19.12.2025 Baljinder Kaur and others ..…Petitioners V/S State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Rohit Sapehiya, Advocate for Mr. Rai Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, D.A.G., Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, quashing the order dated 17.01.2007 (Annexure P-1), whereby the pay of the petitioners has been re-fixed after a period of more than 09 years and huge recoveries have been imposed on the petitioners which the respondents have started effecting @ Rs.1,000/- per month from the salary of the petitioners without affording any opportunity of hearing to them.

2. Brief facts of the case, as have been pleaded in the petition, are that the petitioners joined the respondent-Department as Clerk and at the time of their promotion as Junior Assistant, they were placed in the pay scale of Rs.1500-2700/-. Subsequently, 4th Punjab Pay Commission gave its recommendations, vide which the pay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top