IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH CHANDER AND ANOTHER – Respondent
##PAGE1##
FAO-3513-2025 Page 1 of 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
139
Date of decision: 22.12.2025
FAO-3513-2025(O&M)
Mandeep Kumar & Others
...Appellant(s)
Vs.
Jagdish Chander & Another
...Respondent(s)
***
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate
for the appellants.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
CM-11237-CII-2025
This is an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for
condonation of delay of 30 days in filing the appeal.
After going through the contents of the application, which is
supported by affidavit of appellant No.1, the same is allowed subject to all
just exceptions and delay of 30 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.
CM-11238-CII-2025
This is an application under Rule 5(1) Chapter I Part A Vol. 5 of
the High Court Rules and orders read with Section 151 CPC for condonation
of delay of 947 days in re-filing the appeal.
The only reason given for condoning such inordinate delay is:
SUNENA
2025.12.24 16:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##FAO-3513-2025 Page 2 of 8
“2. That the applicants-appellants had filled appeal before this
Court in the month of August 2022, but the registry has raised
the some objections.
3. That after submitting the paperbook in the registry of court,
the brief has be kept with pending matters but inadvertently
was kept with the admitted matters and due to
misunderstanding the counsel has forgotten about the matter
and could not received back the paperbook from the registry
after objection.
4. That thereafter the matter was listed in the list of incomplete
matter and on 25.11.2024, this Hon'ble Court was pleased to
disposed off the appeal and ordered to consigned the file to
record room on account of non-removal of defects of the
appeal.
5. That when the counsel came to know about the matter,
moved the application for recalling the order dated 25.11.2024
with liberty to grant an opportunity to remove the defect and
vide order dated 25.04.2025, this court has granted to week's
time to remove the defects.”
The Law of Limitation is enacted with a purpose, as a
handmaid of Justice and cannot be ignored/reduced to an ineffective piece
of legislation by giving it the complete go-by. With passage of time, rights
of the parties get crystallised. It is the bounden duty of every litigant to
pursue his case diligently; and it is also the bounden duty of this Court to
ensure that justice inures to both parties concerned.
It is my considered view that keeping in mind the totality of
the facts and circumstances of the case, the reasons cited by the applicant
SUNENA
2025.12.24 16:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##FAO-3513-2025 Page 3 of 8
for condonation of delay, do not constitute sufficient cause. In view of
above, present application is dismissed.
FAO-3513-2025
Present appeal has been filed by claimants seeking
enhancement of compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- awarded by the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (hereinafter ‘the learned Tribunal’) vide
Award dated 05.04.2022 passed in MACP Case No.72 dated 16.08.2021
filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter “the Act”).
The 4 claimants are the husband; and three minor children of deceased
Renu Devi, who was 31 years old at the time of accident.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the ld. Tribunal on the basis of
pleadings and oral & documentary evidence adduced by the parties,
concluded that deceased Renu Devi had died due to the injuries suffered
by her in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 18.06.2021 due to
the involvement of motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-80C-2575
(hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) being driven by
claimant/appellant No.1, owned by respondent No.1, and insured by
respondent No.2.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that very meagre
amount of compensation has been awarded by the learned Tribunal. It is
submitted that the learned Tribunal did not consider that present trends of
SUNENA
2025.12.24 16:00
I attest to the accuracy and
i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.