IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CR No. 9434 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-9434-2025 (O&M)
Decided on: 22.12.2025
Sandeep Kaur
……Petitioner
Versus
Baljit Singh
……Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. N.S. Kanda, Advocate for the respondent.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
By way of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioner has invoked the supervisory jurisdiction
of this Court for setting aside the order dated 18.10.2025 (Annexure P-4)
passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Moga, whereby the
application filed by the petitioner seeking waiver of the statutory period of
six months for recording the second motion statements in a petition under
Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed.
2. Mr. N.S. Kanda, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of
the respondent and has filed his power of attorney.
3. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on
17.12.2017 according to Sikh rites and ceremonies. Admittedly, the parties
cohabited only for five days after marriage. Due to temperamental
differences, the petitioner started residing separately with her parents and
subsequently shifted to Canada for higher studies, whereas the respondent
continued to reside in India. No child was born out of the wedlock.
4. With the intervention of relatives and respectables, the parties
arrived at an amicable settlement, as there was no possibility of
JITEN SHARMA
2025.12.23 12:53
I attest to the accuracy and
Page N: 1 of 5 Pages
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CR No. 9434 of 2025
reconciliation, and they mutually agreed to seek dissolution of marriage by
consent. Consequently, a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Act was
filed and first motion statements were recorded on 19.09.2025.
5. Thereafter, the petitioner moved an application seeking waiver
of the statutory waiting period of six months prescribed under Section 13-B
(2) of the Act. The said application came to be dismissed by the Family
Court vide the impugned order dated 18.10.2025, primarily on the ground
that there was no sufficient material to substantiate the plea of
irretrievable breakdown of marriage, or that efforts for reconciliation
through mediation and conciliation had failed.
6. Assailing the above order, learned counsel for the petitioner
contends that the parties have been living separately for the last
approximately eight years, having resided together only for five days. It is
argued that the geographical separation—petitioner residing in Canada and
respondent in India—coupled with the admitted absence of any child and
pendency of other litigation, clearly demonstrates that the marriage has
irretrievably broken down. It is further submitted that insistence on the
statutory waiting period would serve no purpose except to prolong the
mental agony of the parties.
7. Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the
petition and prays that the same be allowed.
8. This Court has carefully considered the rival submissions and
examined the record.
9. The legal position with regard to waiver of the statutory period
under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is no longer res integra. In
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court authoritatively held that the period prescribed under Section 13-B(2)
is directory and not mandatory, and that the Court has discretion to waive
JITEN SHARMA
2025.12.23 12:53
I attest to the accuracy and
Page N: 2 of 5 Pages
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CR No. 9434 of 2025
the same where insistence on the waiting period would only prolong the
suffering of the parties. The relevant observations read as under:
“19. Applying the above to the present situation, we are of the view that
where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out
to waive the statutory period under Section 13B(2), it can do so after
considering the following:
i) the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13B(2), in a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.