SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 23933

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

206 Date of decision: 22.12.2025 BHARAT VIGA RANI PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Mr. Priyanshu Kamra, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing).

Mr. Hardeep Singh Wadhwa, DAG Punjab.

***

Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case vide FIR No.15 dated 02.07.2020 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station NRI, District Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana. Sections 313, 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B IPC have been added in the FIR during investigation. This is the first petition for anticipatory bail.

2. On 28.11.2025, following order was passed:- “Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.15 dated

02.07.2020 under Sections 406, 498-A IPC, Police Station NRI, District Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana. Sections 313, 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120-B IPC have been added in the FIR during investigation. This is the first petitioner for anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there were no means to serve respondent No.2, who was intentionally absconding being wanted in criminal cases registere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top