IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
##PAGE1##
1
CRA-S-3418-2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(209) CRA-S-3418-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:- 22.12.2025
Rohit
……Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and Anr.
……Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
****
Present: Mr. Akshit Mehta, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Haryana.
****
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present appeal has been for challenging the order dated
27.10.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track
Special Court under POCSO Act, Bhiwani, whereby the second regular bail
filed by the appellant had been dismissed in case bearing FIR No.278 dated
17.08.2025 under Sections 75(2), 78, 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 and Section
3(2) (va) of the SC/ST Act, 1989 and Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012,
registered at Police Station Tosham, District Bhiwani.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is
a young boy, who has been in custody from four months. Moreover, the
testimony of the victim has been duly recorded before the learned trial
Court.
3. Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate, which
is taken on record, according to which the appellant is in custody for the
last 04 months and 01 day.
MANJU
2025.12.23 09:39
I agree to specified
portions of this document
##PAGE2##2
CRA-S-3418-2025 (O&M)
4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering the
fact that the appellant is in custody for the last more than 04 months and is
a young boy of 26 years having clean antecedents and the trial is likely to
take long time, hence, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the
appellant in custody.
5. Without commenting upon the merits, the present petition is
allowed and the appellant is ordered to be released on bail, if not required in
any other case, subject to furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds to the
satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. He/she shall,
however, be released on the following conditions:
i. The appellant shall declare his/her ordinary place of residence
and the mobile number used by him/her.
ii. The appellant will not switch off his/her mobile and in case of
any technical glitch, he/she has to give an alternate number,
which will be available in his absence.
iii. The appellant will mark his/her presence before the SHO
concerned, after every 15 days and in case the SHO refuses to
mark his/her presence, he/she is permitted to make an application
before the Illaqa Magistrate, concerned.
iv. The appellant will not leave the country without the prior
permission of the Court, for which he/she will submit the copy of
his/her passport also. However, in case, the appellant does not
possess a passport, then he/she shall file an undertaking to the
said effect from being released.
MANJU
2025.12.23 09:39
I agree to specified
portions of this document
##PAGE3##3
CRA-S-3418-2025 (O&M)
6. The appellant shall abide by the terms and conditions as
imposed in addition to Section 483 of BNSS, 2023.
7. However, nothing stated above shall be construed as a final
expression of opinion on the merits of the case and this order shall not be
considered as parity qua any other co-accused in any manner whatsoever.
8. It is made clear that, in case, the appellant is found involved in
any such activity once again, the present concession granted shall
automatically stand vacated.
9. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ALOK JAIN)
December 22, 2025 JUDGE
manju
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
MANJU
2025.12.23 09:39
I agree to specified
portions of this document
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.