IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJNISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 09.01.2026 Rajnish --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI.
Present:- Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Raghav Goel, AAG, Punjab.
***
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI.J (Oral)
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of impugned order dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-10) passed by the learned Commissioner, Food and Drugs Administration, Punjab and order dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Zonal Licensing Authority Gurdaspur Zone, whereby the drug licenses nos. PB-GS-136820 & PB-GS-136821 have been cancelled.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was holding a valid retail drug licence under the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and was issued a show cause notice by the respondent-department to which he replied and thereafter an order dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-6) was passed against the petitioner on the basis of various allegations and his licence was cancelled. He submitted that thereafter petitioner filed a stat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.