IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 Vikram --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.
Present:- Mr. Mohit, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Chhavi Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
***
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.J (Oral)
The instant first petition is for seeking concession of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.245 dated 07.10.2021 under Sections 302, 34 IPC (Sections 147, 148, 149, 120-B IPC added later on) & Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been nominated as accused in the aforesaid case registered on the statement of Somnath son of Hari Chand, which reads as under:-
“Statement of Somnath S/o Hari Chand R/o Khasa Pathana and aged 63 years states that I am the resident of above mentioned address and I am an agriculturist. I have two sons elder one is Rajesh @ Raja and younger one is Pankaj Kumar. Both are married. Yesterday dated 06.10.2021 me and my son Pankaj Kumar were travelling in our car No. HR- 23- G-4184 colour white from our Bhuna office to our village Khasa Pathana via Sanchla Road. Ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.